Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 Forgotten Realms RPG Products
 dndclassics.com PDF quality?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Faraer
Great Reader

3308 Posts

Posted - 03 Jul 2014 :  08:05:38  Show Profile  Visit Faraer's Homepage Send Faraer a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Can anyone comment on the resolution of the maps in the new PDFs -- especially the Volo's Guides?

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31701 Posts

Posted - 07 Jul 2014 :  03:54:19  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It really depends on which particular volume of the Volo's Guides. Some translate well, while others are, at most, "appreciable" when compared to their original paper-based interpretation.

As for the majority of the new PDFs, or rather, just those that I've downloaded so far, the quality of the electronically rendered maps are almost equivalent to the age/era of the original source. Maps rendered into PDFs from older Realms books generally appear to be of "mixed" quality when compared to those rendered maps of later era books [like those of 3e, for example].

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Faraer
Great Reader

3308 Posts

Posted - 08 Jul 2014 :  18:33:02  Show Profile  Visit Faraer's Homepage Send Faraer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, it turns out the maps in Volo's Guide to the Dalelands, at least, are 180 dpi, which is nae bad.
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31701 Posts

Posted - 09 Jul 2014 :  04:45:24  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That's one of the few I've yet to check. But 180 dpi is decent enough, I suppose.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7969 Posts

Posted - 09 Jul 2014 :  22:46:16  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Standard print quality circa 1980s and 90s ranged around 300-600 lpi (comparable to dpi), and TSR/WotC seemed to generally publish stuff which was (aside from box/cover art and a few colour plates) somewhere around the low or middle end of physical print quality.

Methinks that 180dpi is roughly only half as good as the printcopy maps. They might look kinda awful when zoomed up, a few of the tiniest details or texts might be illegible. But Volo's maps were never really known for their precision in any case, let alone their accuracy.

[/Ayrik]
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000