Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 Running the Realms
 How do Doppelgangers become Greater versions?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Razz Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 00:42:06
I always wondered about this. I was looking at the Greater Doppelganger in "Monsters of Faerun", and wondered exactly how does a normal doppelganger ever become the greater version (which is obviously much more powerful in all ways).

Is it simply a rare occurence when doppelgangers spawn? Or is it some sort of ritual that takes place to become "reborn" as one of these?

I have plenty of ideas how this could come to be, but I was wondering if anyone knew something more official? Or would Ed maybe know? (assuming he is even allowed to answer such a question)
24   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Eilserus Posted - 14 Dec 2014 : 21:09:18
I can't even access the old archives anymore. And the wayback machine doesn't like the site due to its robots.txt file now. Sigh.
Razz Posted - 14 Dec 2014 : 20:41:19
Yeah for some reason a lot of their links are broken. If it isn't their terrible game editing and marketing, their website management is just as bad.
Fellfire Posted - 09 Dec 2014 : 04:32:06
Anybody got a current linky for Quelzard? Wtf did Wizzy do to their website?! What a friggin abortion.
The Sage Posted - 09 Dec 2014 : 03:52:16
quote:
Originally posted by Fellfire

Shallar? From where did this term originate?

I can't recall the source of the original reference at the moment, but I do remember that Ed referred to them as such in the "Quelzard, Patron of Adventurers" article for the Forging the Forgotten Realms series on the Wizards website.
Fellfire Posted - 09 Dec 2014 : 02:32:49
Shallar? From where did this term originate?
Wooly Rupert Posted - 07 Dec 2014 : 23:37:36
quote:
Originally posted by Razz

Interesting. The idea of greater doppelgangers being illithid experiments.

Except why the "greater" reference? When I think of Greater Doppelganger, it specifically sounds to me like a doppelganger with more doppelganger powers than the others. Other than the brain eating thing, I don't see how illithids would want to create a better version of these that they could not control.

Unless there was an alliance of some sort in the past?

Still...do they breed true or could normal doppelgangers "ascend"? I kinda view them as it is between vampires and vampire lords, with the latter being more powerful and ascended versions of themselves when first created.



They are greater in that their doppelganger abilities are much stronger -- you can read the mind of a greater doppelganger without realizing it's not the person you think it is, and it will have the original's abilities, as well. A regular doppelganger is essentially someone in a good disguise -- a greater doppelganger practically becomes the original person, and they can have multiple identities that they can switch between.

Given that greater doppelgangers are a separate breed and there is no mention at all of regular doppelgangers becoming greater, I think it safe to assume that the greater ones breed true.
Razz Posted - 07 Dec 2014 : 18:18:06
Interesting. The idea of greater doppelgangers being illithid experiments.

Except why the "greater" reference? When I think of Greater Doppelganger, it specifically sounds to me like a doppelganger with more doppelganger powers than the others. Other than the brain eating thing, I don't see how illithids would want to create a better version of these that they could not control.

Unless there was an alliance of some sort in the past?

Still...do they breed true or could normal doppelgangers "ascend"? I kinda view them as it is between vampires and vampire lords, with the latter being more powerful and ascended versions of themselves when first created.
ericlboyd Posted - 15 Nov 2014 : 11:21:58
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay

I am now trying to wrap my mind around the concept of a race that can turn into anything, be half of anything.

Baby Hlaavin: "Mummy, can I grow-up to be anything I want?"
Mommy Hlaavin: "No dear... but half of you can."





Thanks for the laugh.

--Eric
Markustay Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 22:36:31
I am now trying to wrap my mind around the concept of a race that can turn into anything, be half of anything.

Baby Hlaavin: "Mummy, can I grow-up to be anything I want?"
Mommy Hlaavin: "No dear... but half of you can."

Wooly Rupert Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 21:34:41
Ah, good call. Page 46 of Drizzt Do'Urden's Guide to the Underdark:

quote:
Unbeknownst to the Unseen leaders, greater dopplegangers were bred from their lesser kin after decades of experimentation by the Creative Creed of Ch'Chitl.


Though I must note that this doesn't rule out (nor confirm) the idea that greater doppelgangers have some illithid somewhere in their ancestry.
ericlboyd Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 20:29:05
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by ericlboyd

Doppelgangers and greater doppelgangers have unique MC entries in 3.5e.

Hlaavin was a special case. I don't recall all my reasons, but I made him different than a normal greater doppelganger by adding the half-illithid template.

I certainly don't think all greater doppelgangers are half-illithids.

--Eric




They had unique entries in 2E, as well; that was when Hlaavin and greater doppelgangers were introduced.

Have you any speculations to share on the origin of greater doppelgangers?



I thought I put something in Vampires of Waterdeep or DDGttU, but I might be totally misremembering. I'll have to dig.

--Eric
Wooly Rupert Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 19:07:34
quote:
Originally posted by ericlboyd

Doppelgangers and greater doppelgangers have unique MC entries in 3.5e.

Hlaavin was a special case. I don't recall all my reasons, but I made him different than a normal greater doppelganger by adding the half-illithid template.

I certainly don't think all greater doppelgangers are half-illithids.

--Eric



They had unique entries in 2E, as well; that was when Hlaavin and greater doppelgangers were introduced.

Have you any speculations to share on the origin of greater doppelgangers?
ericlboyd Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 18:44:19
Doppelgangers and greater doppelgangers have unique MC entries in 3.5e.

Hlaavin was a special case. I don't recall all my reasons, but I made him different than a normal greater doppelganger by adding the half-illithid template.

I certainly don't think all greater doppelgangers are half-illithids.

--Eric

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by dazzlerdal

My own personal feeling is that Hlaavin is not the only type of greater doppelganger (which could really mean a doppelganger that is more than the standard and so in 3E terms any template added could result in a greater doppelganger).



No, it's not a template or anything -- greater doppelgangers have a very specific set of abilities, which exceed those of regular doppelgangers.

I've no objection to adding a template to a doppelganger; I'm just saying that greater doppelgangers are a specific breed, and not one-offs with templates.

Personally, I would figure that sometime after the fall of the Batrachi, someone (and illithids are a good candidate) captured some regular doppelgangers and started experimenting on them, with the eventual result being a greater doppelganger. It's possible that the original greater doppelgangers were some sort of illithid-doppelganger hybrid that bred true.

Wooly Rupert Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 17:54:57
quote:
Originally posted by dazzlerdal

My own personal feeling is that Hlaavin is not the only type of greater doppelganger (which could really mean a doppelganger that is more than the standard and so in 3E terms any template added could result in a greater doppelganger).



No, it's not a template or anything -- greater doppelgangers have a very specific set of abilities, which exceed those of regular doppelgangers.

I've no objection to adding a template to a doppelganger; I'm just saying that greater doppelgangers are a specific breed, and not one-offs with templates.

Personally, I would figure that sometime after the fall of the Batrachi, someone (and illithids are a good candidate) captured some regular doppelgangers and started experimenting on them, with the eventual result being a greater doppelganger. It's possible that the original greater doppelgangers were some sort of illithid-doppelganger hybrid that bred true.
Gary Dallison Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 12:47:35
I quite like that Hlaavin was shown to be in former service to illithids and spying on Waterdeep before contact was severed and his nature enabled him to support himself and others as an isolated druuth. It built upon stray bits of lore quite nicely i think.

My own personal feeling is that Hlaavin is not the only type of greater doppelganger (which could really mean a doppelganger that is more than the standard and so in 3E terms any template added could result in a greater doppelganger).

I think there were some hints at greater doppelganger being more related to their batrachi ancestors
hashimashadoo Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 12:25:43
That's why I used the vernacular 'as it turned out'. :)
Wooly Rupert Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 11:25:05
As I recall, Hlaavin's nature as a half-illithid was a 3E thing.
hashimashadoo Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 10:09:37
Well, City of Splendors was released five years before 3rd edition. The example of a greater doppelganger given in that book was Hlaavin, who, as it turned out, was half-illithid.
Gary Dallison Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 08:40:09
I thought greater doppelgangers became an illithid experimental version of doppelgangers as 2nd edition progressed into 3rd edition.
hashimashadoo Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 08:26:56
I believe they are a related race but a distinct one. I wonder if they still refer to themselves as shallar.

They were either created by Steven Schend or Ed for the City of Splendors boxed set.
Dalor Darden Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 05:27:14
I always thought, like Wooly, that they are an entirely different creature...possibly the end result of an evolutionary branch even.
Wooly Rupert Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 04:55:37
I've always assumed that greater doppelgangers were a different breed. I don't recall seeing anything saying that the lesser version eventually became the greater version.
Lyiat Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 02:48:06
Age, I would presume.
Diffan Posted - 14 Nov 2014 : 01:54:03
Practice...

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000