Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 How do the phaerimm do it?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Dennis Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 08:49:44

The phaerimm's magic is useless against the antimagic of the beholders, as shown in the following quote [taken from The Siege]. But how do they remain in control of their beholder slaves? Is their mind control impervious to the beholders' antimagic?

quote:

Unable to use their own magic within the antimagic zones created by their beholder slaves, the phaerimm hung back.
22   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Dennis Posted - 23 Apr 2011 : 03:00:44
quote:
Originally posted by Kerryth Silver

Dood, beholders can't use their anti-magic cone on theyselves!
quote:
Originally posted by Dennis


The phaerimm's magic is useless against the antimagic of the beholders, as shown in the following quote [taken from The Siege]. But how do they remain in control of their beholder slaves? Is their mind control impervious to the beholders' antimagic?

quote:

Unable to use their own magic within the antimagic zones created by their beholder slaves, the phaerimm hung back.






As Arik noted. That's why Troy's explanation sort of makes sense. The phaerimm's telepathic power, which is quasi-psionics, makes it impossible (or extremely difficult) for the beholders to free themselves from their masters's hold, who must have sent a message like, "Dispel all magic around you except the one I put on you and on your brethen."
Ayrik Posted - 22 Apr 2011 : 21:06:25
Yeah, but can beholders use it on each other?
Kerryth Silver Posted - 22 Apr 2011 : 19:11:52
Dood, beholders can't use their anti-magic cone on theyselves!
quote:
Originally posted by Dennis


The phaerimm's magic is useless against the antimagic of the beholders, as shown in the following quote [taken from The Siege]. But how do they remain in control of their beholder slaves? Is their mind control impervious to the beholders' antimagic?

quote:

Unable to use their own magic within the antimagic zones created by their beholder slaves, the phaerimm hung back.


Quale Posted - 22 Apr 2011 : 15:04:26
well, if you look into Ooltul, as far as I remember, the beholders serve the Triumvirate there fearing their power, no charms needed. And a lot of them are turned into death tyrants to ease the control, also one of the phaerimm is an expert on the beholder physiology

maybe they can possess from other times like Lovecraft's Yithians
Dennis Posted - 22 Apr 2011 : 00:14:28

Finally, an answer from Troy himself.

quote:


Dennis,

It's been over ten years since I wrote those books, so the truth is that I'm pretty fuzzy on the details. As I recall, however, my rationale was that their mind control was exerted through their telepathic powers, which were non-magical. (I don't want to say psionic, because as I recall, they weren't psionicists -- but I think I considered their telepathy quasi-psionic in origin.)

Hope that helps -- it's the best I can do after so long!

-- Troy
Dennis Posted - 21 Apr 2011 : 12:47:51

That's an interesting theory.

I asked Troy about this. No answer yet.
Quale Posted - 21 Apr 2011 : 12:27:11
quote:
Originally posted by Dennis


So it's still susceptible to the illithids' mind blast? And Troy didn't use them because......it's rather convenient?



yea, illithids and beholders in that book were almost cannon fodder

maybe it's some biological form of domination, with their stings, considering they're all aberrations
Dennis Posted - 21 Apr 2011 : 05:15:28

Some of them might be so intelligent as to bypass the beholders' antimagic. But I'm more inclined to believe that they learned the art of psionics [maybe by eating a psionicist whole?], which they employed on their beholder slaves as their arcane magic was neutralized.
Ayrik Posted - 21 Apr 2011 : 05:06:48
It could be that the phaerimm have such mastery of arcane power that they're able to circumvent or neutralize the beholder powers. Perhaps not every time, perhaps not all individuals, but often enough.

Phaerimm aren't described as possessing psionics in any of the monster entries, though they're very intelligent so it doesn't seem impossible. Then again, they're aberrations and they originate from "somewhere else" so normal rules don't have to apply.

Sneak up behind a beholder? lol, how?
Dennis Posted - 20 Apr 2011 : 23:55:35

So it's still susceptible to the illithids' mind blast? And Troy didn't use them because......it's rather convenient?
Quale Posted - 20 Apr 2011 : 20:17:18
Theoretically a mythal can grant effects like mind blank to protect the inhabitants, just not this one
Dennis Posted - 19 Apr 2011 : 06:16:30
Psionics? I thought the phaerimm are purely arcane spellcasters, as stated in Monsters of Faerun. Or did I miss something?

---

Plot armor? Isn't that applied to Drizzt and to him alone?


quote:
Originally posted by Dagnirion

quote:
Originally posted by Dennis

Does the Evareskan mythal also protect against the illithids' mind blast?



-Things Evereska's mythal could do:

Governs the weather and physical conditions within the Evereskan vale.
Worked against blights and diseases
Defend the city with Meteor Swarm


-Since the mythal was almost destroyed and then re-worked with the Shadow Weave, who knows what the mythal can and cannot do anymore.



I was referring to the time when it was attacked by the phaerimm's army. If it's not invincible against the illithids's mind blasts, the phaerimm should have sent their illithid servants to attack the mythal's defenders, while the beholders worked their disintegration magic against the Evareskans' volleys of arrows.
Lord Karsus Posted - 19 Apr 2011 : 06:07:36
quote:
Originally posted by Dennis

Does the Evareskan mythal also protect against the illithids' mind blast?



-Things Evereska's mythal could do:

Governs the weather and physical conditions within the Evereskan vale.
Worked against blights and diseases
Defend the city with Meteor Swarm


-Since the mythal was almost destroyed and then re-worked with the Shadow Weave, who knows what the mythal can and cannot do anymore.
Lord Karsus Posted - 19 Apr 2011 : 05:57:23
quote:
Originally posted by Dennis

The phaerimm's magic is useless against the antimagic of the beholders, as shown in the following quote [taken from The Siege]. But how do they remain in control of their beholder slaves? Is their mind control impervious to the beholders' antimagic?


-Plot armor.
althen artren Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 23:50:38
I don't think that the mythal's powers have ever been
categorized like Myth Drannor and Myth Glaurach have.
Halidan Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 21:32:45
In addition to what Arik mentioned IIRC, the beholdr's anti-magic field is a 90 degree angle off of the front eye. The phaerimm simple dominate one from behind, and the tell him to summon a few of his friends and then dominate them from behind as well. Once dominated, if the charm neeeds to be renewed, the pharrimm simply command their beholder slaves to shut their eyes and renew the domination.
Ayrik Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 19:25:47
A supernatural effect which doesn't follow rules of magic ... one which happens to also involve mental control ... obviously psionics.

I imagine that the beholder antimagic gaze is not automatic; they must keep their big eye closed most of the time, if simply to avoid de-levitating each other whenever they're grouped. So, if this antimagic is a voluntary action it's quite easy for the phaerimm to issue command paramaters specifying the power is not used on other controlled beholders.

Of course, it might just be that beholders are naturally immune to their species antimagic gaze, perhaps also their charm eyestalk powers. Otherwise, (LE) beholder society would probably always be a numbers game.
Dennis Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 15:31:13

Kinda off topic, but in the same book, anyway:

Does the Evareskan mythal also protect against the illithids' mind blast?
Bladewind Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 15:26:30
Phearimm 'do it' with lots of buzzing and ritualized foreplay.

Alisttair Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 11:55:20
I'm thinking Psionics. I'm about to start re-reading The Siege, so I might have some better insight then.
Dennis Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 09:48:35

Perhaps. However, even if they can't place themselves within their own antimagic zones, the magic [or psionic power] that tied them to their masters would have been severed. Think of the mind control magic as a thread tying their minds to the phaerimm's, and their antimagic as the scissors. Either their scissors are not sharp enough, or the thread is too hard for the scissors to cut through. And I'm leaning towards the latter. But then again, that begs the question what exactly makes the thread granitic? Even if the pharimm employ clerical magic [which is very unlikely], such magic is still prey to the beholders' magic-negating zones.


***I'm curious what's that thing you believed the topic would be?
Sandro Posted - 18 Apr 2011 : 09:04:57
This topic is very thankfully not what the title led me to be believe it would be.

I assume it has to do with the beholders not being able to place themselves within the anti-magic zone, or controlling them through some other (psionics? unlikely) method.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000