Author |
Topic |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
USA
4429 Posts |
Posted - 03 Nov 2018 : 13:20:08
|
So I got Baldur's Gate for my Android phone and I'm playing the crap out of this game, bringing back so many amazing and fun memories of it. And then I got to thinking, this translates well to 5E in a myriad of ways including the options AND Items found therein, not to mention how fun the actual adventure is. So then I started creating NPCs and Bad-guys just for fun (like the Half-Orc cleric Mulahey in the Nashkel Mines and Tarnesh, the assassin outside of The Friendly Arms Inn).
And then I got to thinking how fun taking this adventure to the PnP side of D&D would be. Everything is all pretty much laid out: Plot, NPCs, monsters and gold and magic items, side quests, fun banter, etc.
The big question is that the whole point is for the Ward of Gorion to face off against Sarevok - the Bhaalspawn. With an adventure like this, who really plays the Ward? I have a couple of ideas:
• The Ward is randomly selected from the PCs at Session 1 (in secret).
• The Ward is still Abdel Adrian (adhering to Canon and for future Canon via Murder In Baldur's Gate) and the PCs escort / protect / become Abdel's companions in the game. As if hey were selected by the player akin to Jaherea, Khalid, Xan, etc.
• They're all Wards of Gorion and potential Bhaalspawn in which Saervok wants to eliminate.
• There is no Bhaalspawn in the group and the PCs do the adventure with Abdel doing his own thing in different parts of the Swordcoast and I sprinkle in bits of him (and other NPCs he acquires) exploits when the player's visit towns. The PCs will still largely do the adventure Abdel was supposed to do (Nashkel Mines, investigating the Woods for bandits, finding out who's behind the Iron Throne, etc.) While Abdel is out saving Minc's love interest from the Gnolls or maybe while he's just traipsing about oblivious to the hour at hand.
• OR maybe some other suggestion that I hadn't thought of? I'm really open to ideas here.
Other Aspects to note:
• Magic items. It's no secret that Baldur's Gate has LOTS of magical items in the game. From loads of magical ammo and potions and consumable items to big things like Ankheg Full-Plate, Rings of Wizardry I, swords vs. the undead (my current Paladin is equipped with 'the Harrower' a +1/+3 vs. undead longsword).
I think a LOT of this makes the game fun and if the PCs get a lot of items from their kills, then so be it. I can always tailor the adventure to be more difficult based on random encounters.
• Adhering to Old-School ways. So this adventure is going to be set in the original timeline (1368 DR) so events occur after the Time of Trouble but before the rebirth of Bane and the coming of Netheril. 5E is pretty adaptable in emulating a lot of older styles so I was wondering if old restrictions would make the game "feel" like the computer one (like Paladins being LG only and Human and Cha 17; Druids must be Neutral; Dwarves not being spellcasters, etc.)? Or does this take away from the fun-aspect of 5e and the combinations players might want to employ with the new game?
Anything else I'm missing or not coming up with? Feedback would be much appreciated here.
|
|
Gary Dallison
Great Reader
United Kingdom
6351 Posts |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
USA
36779 Posts |
Posted - 03 Nov 2018 : 14:52:52
|
Another possibility is that the Ward is another NPC, one the PCs have to deal with.
Though of the ideas listed, I like either having all the PCs be Wards, or having Abdel Adrian (a name that really bugs me, for some reason) as the sole Ward while the PCs are fulfilling his role in the adventure.
As for this... "• Adhering to Old-School ways. So this adventure is going to be set in the original timeline (1368 DR) so events occur after the Time of Trouble but before the rebirth of Bane and the coming of Netheril. 5E is pretty adaptable in emulating a lot of older styles so I was wondering if old restrictions would make the game "feel" like the computer one (like Paladins being LG only and Human and Cha 17; Druids must be Neutral; Dwarves not being spellcasters, etc.)? Or does this take away from the fun-aspect of 5e and the combinations players might want to employ with the new game? "
Even though I grew up in 2E and tend to think that way, somewhat, I'd not go full-on with the 2E restrictions. I do favor LG paladins*, and druids that have a neutral aspect to their alignment, but I've always had a hard time wrapping my head around true neutral nature junkies being adventurers. And dwarven spellcasters don't bother me; my sole quibble there has always been the lack of a canon explanation for why their magical issues suddenly went away.
It is my opinion that the plot is more important, here, than emulating an adaptation of an earlier ruleset. Whilst I don't know your players, I think the plot would be much more fun than sticking with the oft arbitrary seeming class restrictions of 2E.
*Paladins -- in the revised 2E PHB, it says this: "The paladin is a noble and heroic warrior, the symbol of all that is right and true in the world. As such, he has high ideals that he must maintain at all times. Throughout legend and history there are many heroes who could be called paladins: Roland and the 12 Peers of Charlemagne, Sir Lancelot, Sir Gawain, and Sir Galahad are all examples of the class." Because of this, and because that's the era of D&D that I grew up in, I feel quite strongly that paladins must be LG.
However... One of the most interesting characters in Weis & Hickman's Rose of the Prophet trilogy was Auda ibn Jad, a Black Paladin of Zhakrin, the main god of evil. The Black Paladins were an interesting bunch, and they quite aptly depicted an evil but not chaotic evil group -- something I'm not sure I'd seen before then. And it was that group that opened my eyes to the idea of evil paladins.
And I like the idea of holy warriors serving deities. So while I have no issue with paladin-types that have different abilities, I favor keeping the term "paladin" for the LG ones, and using other terms for similar types of other alignments. I know there was a Dragon article or something that explored the idea, going with "Paladin of this" and "Paladin of that" for the other versions, but I'd be more inclined to rename them entirely, despite the extra bookkeeping involved.
|
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen! |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|