Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Update on D&D movie rights lawsuit
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Dark Wizard
Senior Scribe

USA
830 Posts

Posted - 18 Sep 2014 :  06:07:38  Show Profile Send Dark Wizard a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
The two interested parties made their opening arguments in the case dealing with which company the rights to the D&D movie franchise belongs to, Hasbro (holder of all other D&D IP) or Sweetpea Entertainment (production company responsible for the three existing D&D movies).

Link: http://deadline.com/2014/09/dungeons-and-dragons-movie-rights-trial-sequel-lawsuit-warner-bros-universal-835320/#respond

This one could be interesting (from my albeit layman's legal understanding) as Hasbro doesn't seem to have a definitive smoking canon in this case against Sweetpea, because there is evidence they've acknowledge Sweetpea as the rights holder throughout the years and signed off on the various direct-to-DVD or direct-to-cable sequels. Hasbro is making claims the distribution matters (and it might if the contract language can be interpreted in such a way) and that Sweetpea's production partner Silver Pictures only paid a lower (non-sequel movie) sum as a licensing fee for the 2010 sequel.

The article notes this might have some wide reaching implications for the movie industry at large because it could (re)define the concept of a sequel, which is especially relevant in today's entertainment market with frequent reboots, serial franchises, and complex partnerships to get big blockbuster films off the ground.

Kentinal
Great Reader

4685 Posts

Posted - 18 Sep 2014 :  06:22:01  Show Profile Send Kentinal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well it looks interesting, that Hasbro signed off on movies in the past it would appear Hasbro retains the right to not sign off on a sequel. A concept that because permission to use copyright material once grants the rights to unlimited sequels appears to fly into the face of what copyright is meant to protect.
Clearly the actual contract matters as under laying document.

"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000