Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Nostalgia for Unearthed Arcana (AD&D)
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1272 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  22:20:56  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Went through an old box of AD&D books today and was seized with a really strong level of nostalgia for Unearthed Arcana.

It reminded me of an old play session where my wizardess came across her first book of evil spells involving planar binding and... encouragement spells.

Gate, Succor, Torment, Dolor, Truename, Spiritwrack, things like that found in an evil archmage's tome. And it was mine. The dark power, the incredible possibility, and the things that all happened as a result of obtaining it. Ah, nostalgia!

But also the introduction of cantrips, so long ago. Such a novel, but perfect idea at the time. Fiddling about with innovative and creative ways to use and adapt cantrips was a favorite pastime of my wizardess all those years ago.

What is your "yen" for, the most fun thing you remember doing "back when" from any edition of D&D? Do you want your favorite thing incorporated into 5E/Next in some way?

Personally, I like the inclusion of cantrips as "at wills" in the playtest materials. But I think there should be more fluidity in some ways. I think mages should have "at wills" for a huge amount of very low-powered cantrips (and clerics their "osirons").

Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families!

Edited by - Therise on 05 Oct 2013 22:21:24

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36779 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  22:33:43  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
There was an article in Dragon, in 2E, that made cantrips a proficiency. As I recall, it was 4 cantrips a day, plus one per mage level, up until 8th level, at which point they became unlimited. And you just needed a spellcraft check to do one; this limitation also went away, at 5th level, IIRC.

That was, to me, the best approach I'd ever seen for cantrips. It didn't waste a spell slot, and still kept them as the minor magical exercises we've seen in fiction. I'd love to see something similar adapted for 5E, if they've not done it already (I've not been looking at the playtest material).

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1272 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  22:38:02  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

There was an article in Dragon, in 2E, that made cantrips a proficiency. As I recall, it was 4 cantrips a day, plus one per mage level, up until 8th level, at which point they became unlimited. And you just needed a spellcraft check to do one; this limitation also went away, at 5th level, IIRC.

That was, to me, the best approach I'd ever seen for cantrips. It didn't waste a spell slot, and still kept them as the minor magical exercises we've seen in fiction. I'd love to see something similar adapted for 5E, if they've not done it already (I've not been looking at the playtest material).


OooooOooohh!!! I don't recall ever seeing that, but that is a GREAT idea! Thanks for mentioning this!

It occurs to me that our group at the time had moved to Rolemaster. I bet that's why I wasn't paying as much attention to Dragon. But now I really want to go look this up.


Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families!
Go to Top of Page

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7966 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  22:52:39  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
2E Player‘s Option: Spells & Magic offered a proficiency which synergized cantrips. It allowed a wizard to perform minor cantrip-like magics at will (for an extended duration, anyhow) without blowing through all his memorized cantrip spell slots. Stuff like teleporting a coin from one hand to another during stage performances, or like flipping through the pages of a book through puffs of wind.

[/Ayrik]
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1272 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  23:07:55  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Do either of you remember the sourcebook or Dragon this was in? I'm going through some, but it's slow-going.

Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families!
Go to Top of Page

rjfras
Learned Scribe

261 Posts

Posted - 05 Oct 2013 :  23:29:41  Show Profile  Visit rjfras's Homepage Send rjfras a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dragon 221, starting on page 20, an article called "The Little Wish"
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1272 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  02:24:44  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rjfras

Dragon 221, starting on page 20, an article called "The Little Wish"


Awesome, thank you!

I wonder if unlimited cantrips (at high level) might be unbalancing for 5E/Next... does anyone think this would be too OP as a house rule?



Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families!
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36779 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  06:16:55  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by rjfras

Dragon 221, starting on page 20, an article called "The Little Wish"


Awesome, thank you!

I wonder if unlimited cantrips (at high level) might be unbalancing for 5E/Next... does anyone think this would be too OP as a house rule?






If you stick with cantrips having minor effects and doing minimal (if any) damage, I don't see how it can be unbalancing...

The character I played, that made heavy use of cantrips, did things like use them to shave, to mend his clothes, to dry his clothes after getting them wet, to add spice to food, things like that -- effects that fully embraced the flavor of cantrips, but had no real in-game effects. He did do a few things that had in-game effects, but even those were minor: coating a floor with dust to see if anything invisible was on it, or conjuring a small ball of light behind a wall to look for openings.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
15724 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  12:59:06  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yes, I have much love for Unearthed Arcana as well. It was like a book of 'cheat codes' for D&D (not really, but it had that same feeling - forbidden knowledge that lead to some in-game awesomeness). When you cracked the cover, you felt like you were seeing stuff you weren't supposed to know about... that was so COOL.

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

There was an article in Dragon, in 2E, that made cantrips a proficiency. As I recall, it was 4 cantrips a day, plus one per mage level, up until 8th level, at which point they became unlimited. And you just needed a spellcraft check to do one; this limitation also went away, at 5th level, IIRC.

That was, to me, the best approach I'd ever seen for cantrips. It didn't waste a spell slot, and still kept them as the minor magical exercises we've seen in fiction. I'd love to see something similar adapted for 5E, if they've not done it already (I've not been looking at the playtest material).

By the same token, those 'minor magics' should scale with the level of the character. A fireball is probably a very minor magic to someone like Larloch.

In the Spell point system I used, I had it where you didn't pay for cantrips if you specialized (the cost to cast a spell was its level+1, -1 for specialists of the same school). As you leveled, spells could become cheaper, which would eventually give you something akin to the 4e system with 'at will' powers (because the spell point costs became negligible).

There was also a system somewhere regarding 'signature spells', and it was along the same lines as a fighter's 'preferred weapon'. A mechanic like that could work, in that a spell that they used often could become their 'signature power' and not count against the normal number of spells allowed (although thats not how they worked in RAW, IIRC).

I love the idea of cantrips, but without a spell point system they become unmanageable; if you make them cost, no-one will use them. If you make them free, they will over-use them.

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone


Edited by - Markustay on 06 Oct 2013 13:04:26
Go to Top of Page

Neil Bishop
Learned Scribe

Singapore
100 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  14:08:09  Show Profile  Visit Neil Bishop's Homepage Send Neil Bishop a Private Message  Reply with Quote
My favourite part of Unearthed Arcana was the spell stoneskin, although we had already been using it from an issue of Dragon. It was so difficult to get players to play magic-users until that spell came along.

Regards
NXB
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36779 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  14:16:49  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay

By the same token, those 'minor magics' should scale with the level of the character. A fireball is probably a very minor magic to someone like Larloch.



Why should they scale? It doesn't matter if you're 1st level or 20th, the amount of effort it takes to start a fire or tie your shoes isn't going to change.

quote:
Originally posted by Markustay

I love the idea of cantrips, but without a spell point system they become unmanageable; if you make them cost, no-one will use them. If you make them free, they will over-use them.



What's the concern about them being over-used? With only minor, non-damaging effects, you're not going to unbalance anything when you use them, whether its once a day or twenty times a day.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1272 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  14:59:30  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

What's the concern about them being over-used? With only minor, non-damaging effects, you're not going to unbalance anything when you use them, whether its once a day or twenty times a day.


Personally, I agree and I love the idea of having a wizard use magic all the time for really minor things. Heating a cup of tea, chilling someone's beer, lighting a candle for reading, all those kinds of things really make the magic-user feel more mystical and less like a gun with X bullets per day. The Vancian system has its advantages, but in lieu of changing completely over to a power point system this seems like an excellent way to add flavor without going overboard.

I do agree that any damaging cantrips should be very limited to killing extremely tiny things like vermin (bugs, maybe a mouse) and not have any real value in combat. Players are known for coming up with innovative ways of breaking game mechanics, though, and that would be my primary concern. I want flavor and fluff, but balanced against the needs of mechanics.


Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families!
Go to Top of Page

Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe

USA
422 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  16:46:19  Show Profile Send Kris the Grey a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Excellently timed find all

I just converted BACK to the 2E rules set from Pathfinder in my longstanding campaign and the players were feeling the loss of their 'at will' cantrips (from PF). I directed them to take a peek here and at the relevant 2E rules so we might discuss it. I'll let you know what we decide to adopt.

Thanks Therise for starting the thread (and to the rest of you for recalling the system).

Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association
Go to Top of Page

Tamsar
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
141 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  16:56:23  Show Profile Send Tamsar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
My original copy of Unearthed Arcana is well tattered, the binding wasn't much cop, and it fell to pieces. Still got much love for that book. The internal B&W art is awesome.

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Go to Top of Page

Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe

USA
422 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  16:56:42  Show Profile Send Kris the Grey a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ayrik,

Are you referring to the 'Prestidigitation' proficiency on page 54 of 2E Spells and Magic?

Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association
Go to Top of Page

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7966 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  18:03:28  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I believe so, although I don‘t have access to my 2E books right now.

[/Ayrik]
Go to Top of Page

Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe

USA
422 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  20:15:59  Show Profile Send Kris the Grey a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ayrik,

Having looked it over, I found that it is more of a 'slight of hand' skill than an actual magical cantrip like power. So, the Dragon Magazine article system seems a more likely alternative to the old school cantrip spell.

Thanks for pointing it out though!

Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association
Go to Top of Page

Dalor Darden
Great Reader

USA
4211 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2013 :  20:21:46  Show Profile Send Dalor Darden a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I love this thread too...thanks Therise!

I'm running a 2e PbP game right now...and this will be perfect!

The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me!
Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
495 Posts

Posted - 11 Oct 2013 :  21:00:24  Show Profile Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

What's the concern about them being over-used? With only minor, non-damaging effects, you're not going to unbalance anything when you use them, whether its once a day or twenty times a day.


Personally, I agree and I love the idea of having a wizard use magic all the time for really minor things. Heating a cup of tea, chilling someone's beer, lighting a candle for reading, all those kinds of things really make the magic-user feel more mystical and less like a gun with X bullets per day. The Vancian system has its advantages, but in lieu of changing completely over to a power point system this seems like an excellent way to add flavor without going overboard.

I do agree that any damaging cantrips should be very limited to killing extremely tiny things like vermin (bugs, maybe a mouse) and not have any real value in combat. Players are known for coming up with innovative ways of breaking game mechanics, though, and that would be my primary concern. I want flavor and fluff, but balanced against the needs of mechanics.


I had a DM that used the the 'cantrip proficiency' rule, and I used it during play to shut down a goblin shaman. Whether it allowed it rules-wise, or the DM was winging it, I can't say, but my wizard had run out of spells, and all he had left was cantrip magic...so...

The shaman would start casting a healing spell for his goblin buddies - and he would sneeze, ruining his spell. The next round, he would again start casting his healing spell...and sneeze. And so on. This pretty much kept him locked down until the encounter was over. He was the last goblin standing, and the only one with enough sense to run after a point.

Was the DM just trying to make it so I felt my wizard was useful and contributing something? Maybe. But this is my most vivid memory of this rule. I'll have to see if I have that issue lying around.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36779 Posts

Posted - 11 Oct 2013 :  21:27:31  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
In that situation, I (as a DM) would have allowed a concentration check of some sort -- trying to recall 2E proficiencies, prolly a Spellcraft check -- for the caster to have managed to concentrate enough to get a spell off.

It is a creative use of a cantrip, certainly, but with the fact that cantrips are minor magic, I'd not allow them to so readily incapacitate someone.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
495 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  01:01:22  Show Profile Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

In that situation, I (as a DM) would have allowed a concentration check of some sort -- trying to recall 2E proficiencies, prolly a Spellcraft check -- for the caster to have managed to concentrate enough to get a spell off.

It is a creative use of a cantrip, certainly, but with the fact that cantrips are minor magic, I'd not allow them to so readily incapacitate someone.



Looking back on it, I likely wouldn't, either. The DM was one of those 'rolling dice constantly' to mask his actual rolls, so I have no idea if the goblin shaman was rolling Proficiency checks against the cantrip or not. If he was, the shaman's success rate was nothing short of abysmal, and this DM was no Monty Haul advocate - so I am left with only speculation.

In the old DM's place, assuming I did allow it, I'd probably have the character make a Ranged Touch attack in addition to his Spellcraft Proficiency roll to see if it even hits the goblin. If it does, then the goblin gets a save, with his WIS bonus added, minus the degree of success of the mage's roll against his Spellcraft Proficiency to keep his clerical spell from misfiring. That's a lot more bookwork than cantrips are supposed to have, sure, but anything less is a bit lopsided.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31701 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  03:36:54  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I literally haven't looked at this book in over a decade. And yet, it's among my favourites from the AD&D-era. The 3e update was kind of cool, but the original really did have a charm all it's own.

So, due to Therise's kind mental-nudging... I'm digging this book out next week for a long overdue re-read.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Dalor Darden
Great Reader

USA
4211 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  03:51:27  Show Profile Send Dalor Darden a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

I literally haven't looked at this book in over a decade. And yet, it's among my favourites from the AD&D-era. The 3e update was kind of cool, but the original really did have a charm all it's own.

So, due to Therise's kind mental-nudging... I'm digging this book out next week for a long overdue re-read.



Well worth it! I'm using it extensively right now in my new campaign...especially the Barbarian class is coming to the fore very soon!

The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me!
Go to Top of Page

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7966 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  04:58:55  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I recall a long, long-ago passionate argument among players about the 1E Barbarian (along with drow and svirfneblin) being vastly unbalanced and overpowered. Even moreso than top level assassins, monks, and bards - primarily because the special advantages of the class (along with raw combat stats) granted significant advantages at such low levels, even considering the insane experience point costs for level progression.

It seemed quite evident (from ancient Dragon magazines which came out before UA) that Gar Gygax, or perhaps Ernie Gygax, was greatly impressed by Ahnold‘s barbarian movies of the time.

[/Ayrik]
Go to Top of Page

The Masked Mage
Great Reader

USA
2420 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  05:26:56  Show Profile Send The Masked Mage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Old Man Harpell

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

In that situation, I (as a DM) would have allowed a concentration check of some sort -- trying to recall 2E proficiencies, prolly a Spellcraft check -- for the caster to have managed to concentrate enough to get a spell off.

It is a creative use of a cantrip, certainly, but with the fact that cantrips are minor magic, I'd not allow them to so readily incapacitate someone.



Looking back on it, I likely wouldn't, either. The DM was one of those 'rolling dice constantly' to mask his actual rolls, so I have no idea if the goblin shaman was rolling Proficiency checks against the cantrip or not. If he was, the shaman's success rate was nothing short of abysmal, and this DM was no Monty Haul advocate - so I am left with only speculation.

In the old DM's place, assuming I did allow it, I'd probably have the character make a Ranged Touch attack in addition to his Spellcraft Proficiency roll to see if it even hits the goblin. If it does, then the goblin gets a save, with his WIS bonus added, minus the degree of success of the mage's roll against his Spellcraft Proficiency to keep his clerical spell from misfiring. That's a lot more bookwork than cantrips are supposed to have, sure, but anything less is a bit lopsided.

- OMH



That is explicitly ignoring the basic rules of cantrips, which:

"are completely unable to cause a loss of hit points, cannot affect the concentration of spellcasters, and can only create small, obviously magical materials"
Go to Top of Page

Dalor Darden
Great Reader

USA
4211 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  05:45:32  Show Profile Send Dalor Darden a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ayrik

I recall a long, long-ago passionate argument among players about the 1E Barbarian (along with drow and svirfneblin) being vastly unbalanced and overpowered. Even moreso than top level assassins, monks, and bards - primarily because the special advantages of the class (along with raw combat stats) granted significant advantages at such low levels, even considering the insane experience point costs for level progression.

It seemed quite evident (from ancient Dragon magazines which came out before UA) that Gar Gygax, or perhaps Ernie Gygax, was greatly impressed by Ahnold‘s barbarian movies of the time.



I see that argument, except that early level Barbarians pretty much have to play alone...they can't associate with Wizards until much later (level 6 if needed...as in life and death, and then at level 8 occasionally). Which to me meant that they were intended as a single player experience really. By the time a Barbarian got to level 8 he had gained 275k experience...which put wizards at 10th level. By the time a Barbarian got to 10th level (and was a true menace to the world!) a wizard would have been at 12th level and was easily more than a menace on their own really.

As a loner class, Barbarians were fun to play...but few people were going to go without a wizard in the party for so long; and so I never played in a group with a Barbarian as either a player or DM.

The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me!
Go to Top of Page

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7966 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  20:10:03  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Agreed, the presence of a barbarian in the party was pretty crippling in terms of access to magic, at least until he was about 3rd-5th level (and everybody else was basically 6th-8th level) - by then people considered multiclassing, the Rangers and Paladins could access a few spells, the monk could destroy things barehanded, and the thief/assassin (who was basically 10th level!) was really good a “hiding“ magical trinkets.

Everybody wanted to have a barbarian in the beginning ... unless their DM chuckled and replied “I wish you guys luck without some kind of priest in the party“.

[/Ayrik]
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36779 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  20:42:16  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Masked Mage

quote:
Originally posted by Old Man Harpell

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

In that situation, I (as a DM) would have allowed a concentration check of some sort -- trying to recall 2E proficiencies, prolly a Spellcraft check -- for the caster to have managed to concentrate enough to get a spell off.

It is a creative use of a cantrip, certainly, but with the fact that cantrips are minor magic, I'd not allow them to so readily incapacitate someone.



Looking back on it, I likely wouldn't, either. The DM was one of those 'rolling dice constantly' to mask his actual rolls, so I have no idea if the goblin shaman was rolling Proficiency checks against the cantrip or not. If he was, the shaman's success rate was nothing short of abysmal, and this DM was no Monty Haul advocate - so I am left with only speculation.

In the old DM's place, assuming I did allow it, I'd probably have the character make a Ranged Touch attack in addition to his Spellcraft Proficiency roll to see if it even hits the goblin. If it does, then the goblin gets a save, with his WIS bonus added, minus the degree of success of the mage's roll against his Spellcraft Proficiency to keep his clerical spell from misfiring. That's a lot more bookwork than cantrips are supposed to have, sure, but anything less is a bit lopsided.

- OMH



That is explicitly ignoring the basic rules of cantrips, which:

"are completely unable to cause a loss of hit points, cannot affect the concentration of spellcasters, and can only create small, obviously magical materials"



While that is technically correct, I'm not sure that I'd stick with that rule as an absolute -- I would think that a forced sneeze or being stung by a bee could prove distracting. The cough cantrip requires a saving throw for the victim to not be interrupted by the coughing, so I'd expect a failed saving throw could interrupt spellcasting (though I'd again allow the victim a check to maintain the casting). And if the firefinger cantrip can set things aflame, it could certainly distract someone whose clothes are set on fire, or who is directly contacted by the flaming finger.

Obviously the majority of cantrips aren't going to break concentration or cause damage, but I can see situations where that would not be the case. And even a creatively used cantrip should still leave the victim a saving throw.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
15724 Posts

Posted - 12 Oct 2013 :  20:59:31  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If you roll a natural '1' (fumble) while try to save from a sneeze, does your head come off?

Or do you just break your neck?

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone

Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
495 Posts

Posted - 13 Oct 2013 :  09:01:12  Show Profile Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay

If you roll a natural '1' (fumble) while try to save from a sneeze, does your head come off?

Or do you just break your neck?



Your sinus cavity might just explode in a bloody mess. Though it was hardly life-threatening, I have seen this happen.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

xaeyruudh
Master of Realmslore

USA
1853 Posts

Posted - 16 Oct 2013 :  16:12:45  Show Profile  Visit xaeyruudh's Homepage Send xaeyruudh a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

I'd love to see something similar adapted for 5E


Not exactly the same from what I can see, but in D&D Next wizards should have unlimited at-will use of cantrips beginning at level 1. I think they start off knowing 4 cantrips, and iirc they get 2 new spells each level and they can select cantrips for these if they want to. Cantrips will include some damaging spells, like ray of frost, and the damage will scale with level. Which will be the wizards' main means of doing damage since their overall spells-per-day drops dramatically.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000