Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Reboot of the Realms for 5th edition.
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 23

sfdragon
Great Reader

2018 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  18:02:32  Show Profile Send sfdragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Life's a dance you learn as you go somes times you lead and sometimes you follow- John Michael montgomery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFQCtUM2ZYg


in life there is always a risk d remember that you can nly please a some of the people, some of the time, you can please alot of the people alot of the time, but you can not please all the people all the time.


why is being a wizard like being a drow? both are likely to find a dagger in the back from a rival or one looking to further his own goals, fame and power


My FR fan fiction
Magister's GAmbit
http://steelfiredragon.deviantart.com/gallery/33539234
Go to Top of Page

Varl
Learned Scribe

USA
252 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  18:12:58  Show Profile Send Varl a Private Message  Reply with Quote
How the excellent and interesting changes described in Mr. Xenophon's post could be construed as wanting a system reboot I don't quite understand. I think his ideas for world evolution and change by having events unfold outside the scope of what's officially released is at the heart of why we play this game.

"We're not out of here in 10 minutes, we won't need no rockets to fly through space." -Parker, Alien.
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1265 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  18:18:38  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by sfdragon

Life's a dance you learn as you go somes times you lead and sometimes you follow- John Michael montgomery



Ugh. No.

Clearly, Life is a Highway, not a sappy C&W dance.


4E Realms was awful, but it's water under the Boareskyr Bridge. Let's make 5E Realms truly shine!
Go to Top of Page

sfdragon
Great Reader

2018 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  18:48:19  Show Profile Send sfdragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by sfdragon

Life's a dance you learn as you go somes times you lead and sometimes you follow- John Michael montgomery



Ugh. No.

Clearly, Life is a Highway, not a sappy C&W dance.





'm sorry you feel that way.... but it was the first one to come to mind.


but that works too

why is being a wizard like being a drow? both are likely to find a dagger in the back from a rival or one looking to further his own goals, fame and power


My FR fan fiction
Magister's GAmbit
http://steelfiredragon.deviantart.com/gallery/33539234
Go to Top of Page

Brimstone
Great Reader

USA
2904 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  19:06:10  Show Profile Send Brimstone a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Right...

"These things also I have observed: that knowledge of our world is
to be nurtured like a precious flower, for it is the most precious
thing we have. Wherefore guard the word written and heed
words unwritten and set them down ere they fade . . . Learn
then, well, the arts of reading, writing, and listening true, and they
will lead you to the greatest art of all: understanding."
Alaundo of Candlekeep
Go to Top of Page

sfdragon
Great Reader

2018 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2012 :  21:27:28  Show Profile Send sfdragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
HAHAHAHAHAHA

nice sig Brimstone.

May Abadar take note of it while Oghma sits back drinking

why is being a wizard like being a drow? both are likely to find a dagger in the back from a rival or one looking to further his own goals, fame and power


My FR fan fiction
Magister's GAmbit
http://steelfiredragon.deviantart.com/gallery/33539234
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
14020 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  01:32:13  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If he is Mr. Misc, he and I have butted heads many times... but we usually tend to agree with each other when we are forced to reduce our arguments down to pure logic, or when bouncing Realmslore back-and-forth. I've said this before - Trolls are not always wrong.

I think that what individuals want isn't always whats best for the IP. We had a very select group of people make all the decisions the last time, and thats why we got a Realms most fans don't like. I'm sure most of us would have gotten the same results had we been in charge; everyone wants something different out of FR, and when you try to boil it down to 2-3 very specific flavors, it just doesn't work.

There are a select few designers that 'get' The Forgotten Realms, and they could probably do a good job, but it will never be perfect, because everyone has different tastes (as it should be). All I ask at this point is for them to create quality Realmslore, whatever the era. No more creating RSEs (and other events) just to pad-out novel sales - thats damaging to the franchise.

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone

Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Moderator

Australia
31690 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  02:34:31  Show Profile  Send The Sage an AOL message  Click to see The Sage's MSN Messenger address  Send The Sage a Yahoo! Message Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Folks, you've been asked to move past the discussion of trolls/trolling. It has nothing to do with subject of this particular scroll.

Please leave it at that.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
470 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  05:24:22  Show Profile  Visit Old Man Harpell's Homepage Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by Eilserus

Like you say, money talks. If Ed's Realms book sells well, we're likely to see more of that type of product sooner or later. Whether it's an alternate timeline or not, it's bound to be a dead sexy product.


If Ed's Realms (the upcoming product) is actually a separate timeline, without the ToT and Spellplague, really and truly Greenwood's home game Realms, I will support it by buying multiple copies and giving them to friends. I'll advocate for it to supplant the current canon Realms, and constantly ask for support of it in DDI and other publications.



All indications are that it is a separate 'timeline' from the Shattered Realms.

This being the case, I will be buying three copies for myself (one for common use, one for the library shelf, and one shrink-wrapped and stored away, just in case), one for my son (who is presently forbidden such things at Annapolis), and badgering several friends who I know are Realms aficionados to each buy at least one copy.

This will be a far cry from 4th Edition, where I told them all that if they had a deep-seated need to look at the material, to save their money and come look at my books. I think one of them has looked through them while he was over to help me move some furniture, and he hasn't said anything about it, then or since.

Whether you consider it a 'reboot' or an 'alternate timeline', good money says that this will be the publication to put your money into.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

Therise
Master of Realmslore

1265 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  05:53:14  Show Profile Send Therise a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Old Man Harpell

quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by Eilserus

Like you say, money talks. If Ed's Realms book sells well, we're likely to see more of that type of product sooner or later. Whether it's an alternate timeline or not, it's bound to be a dead sexy product.


If Ed's Realms (the upcoming product) is actually a separate timeline, without the ToT and Spellplague, really and truly Greenwood's home game Realms, I will support it by buying multiple copies and giving them to friends. I'll advocate for it to supplant the current canon Realms, and constantly ask for support of it in DDI and other publications.



All indications are that it is a separate 'timeline' from the Shattered Realms.

This being the case, I will be buying three copies for myself (one for common use, one for the library shelf, and one shrink-wrapped and stored away, just in case), one for my son (who is presently forbidden such things at Annapolis), and badgering several friends who I know are Realms aficionados to each buy at least one copy.

This will be a far cry from 4th Edition, where I told them all that if they had a deep-seated need to look at the material, to save their money and come look at my books. I think one of them has looked through them while he was over to help me move some furniture, and he hasn't said anything about it, then or since.

Whether you consider it a 'reboot' or an 'alternate timeline', good money says that this will be the publication to put your money into.

- OMH


Excellent! And oh my Annapolis. Yes, quite restrictive, but a truly first-rate education if you're referring to what I think you're referring to. Having a kid get in there is a testament to preparation, hard work, and good parenting.


4E Realms was awful, but it's water under the Boareskyr Bridge. Let's make 5E Realms truly shine!
Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
470 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  06:12:35  Show Profile  Visit Old Man Harpell's Homepage Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by Old Man Harpell

quote:
Originally posted by Therise

quote:
Originally posted by Eilserus

Like you say, money talks. If Ed's Realms book sells well, we're likely to see more of that type of product sooner or later. Whether it's an alternate timeline or not, it's bound to be a dead sexy product.


If Ed's Realms (the upcoming product) is actually a separate timeline, without the ToT and Spellplague, really and truly Greenwood's home game Realms, I will support it by buying multiple copies and giving them to friends. I'll advocate for it to supplant the current canon Realms, and constantly ask for support of it in DDI and other publications.



All indications are that it is a separate 'timeline' from the Shattered Realms.

This being the case, I will be buying three copies for myself (one for common use, one for the library shelf, and one shrink-wrapped and stored away, just in case), one for my son (who is presently forbidden such things at Annapolis), and badgering several friends who I know are Realms aficionados to each buy at least one copy.

This will be a far cry from 4th Edition, where I told them all that if they had a deep-seated need to look at the material, to save their money and come look at my books. I think one of them has looked through them while he was over to help me move some furniture, and he hasn't said anything about it, then or since.

Whether you consider it a 'reboot' or an 'alternate timeline', good money says that this will be the publication to put your money into.

- OMH


Excellent! And oh my Annapolis. Yes, quite restrictive, but a truly first-rate education if you're referring to what I think you're referring to. Having a kid get in there is a testament to preparation, hard work, and good parenting.


It does indeed mean what you think. I have been told that I'm even more insufferable than normal of late. Regardless, thank you for the kind words. He's really busted his tail to get there. His players have lost a top-rate DM, but my sympathies extend only so far.

For the first time in years, I have been able to say "I want THIS for my birthday". Sire Greenwood's new book has given me great optimism for the future of our beloved Realms.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

Thrasymachus
Learned Scribe

194 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  08:41:46  Show Profile Send Thrasymachus a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Matt James
I don't think one should lend much weight to this commentary on previous design. Of course when you're bringing out a new product, you try to champion it over the old.



Why not just champion it over the real competitors like Warhammer and the like. Why would Wizards compete with itself? I have always found it bizarre that you couldnít go to the Wizards website, and buy any of their old products. At the bookstore if you wanted anything that didnít have Drizzit in it you have to go to Ebay.

quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

So you're view on the Realms is more important than some kid that started reading the books these past couple of years? I don't understand why is has to be an all-or-nothing approach.



quote:
Originally posted by Matt James
Posts like this is why anti-continuity bled its way into the setting. You're saying people have to like the Realms the way you do, or else it's invalid. This is the highest degree of arrogance, and not something that will ever improve/advance the setting.



To put it another way
I have been a faithful regular at this restaurant since 1987. Itís fantastic. Itís not the only place I eat, but itís the only place that I can be found faithfully once or twice a month. Over the years I found that the best dish is the Surf and Turf (read that continuity & lore). If you were to stack the dishes one on top of another it would be darn high (read that as hundreds of dollars of Dragon magazine, Dungeon Magazine, just about every novel, and Just about every Forgotten Realms product).
Now I understand good help is hard to find, and every several years a new chef will be brought in, and make his version of Surf & Turf (Read that as new editions & RSE). I roll with it, and I give it a chance. And I keep coming back even though itís not quite as good, but I am okay, because the Surf and Turf doesnít have to have salsa unless I want to go a little crazy. Remember, the first chef was the best (Read that Old Grey Box), but I stick with the restaurant because I like the ambiance (continuation of the setting), and the food isnít too much of a change.
Then one day (read that as 4E), I come in, and my favorite table is gone. The Surf and Turf is gone, and thereís new customer trying the Peanut and Jelly Sampler at the newly installed buffet, and heís still got his nose tuned up at it because itís to complicated for his palette (Read that as 4th EditionÖ simplification).
I ask whatís up, and am told the restaurant is trying to bring in new customers. Mr New Prospective Customer was walking by, and the owner talked to him for 5 minutes, and bam. He waves his arm over the new buffet and tells me Iíll love it.
Sorry, I tried. I really did. But Iíll come by occasionally and take a look at what the special are (read that as browse what products that might relate to what I am doing), and I might come in there is something that strikes me as worth it but by and by why should I be a faithful customer here?
The funny thing is we know where the Old Chef is. Hint: Heís in a library in Canada. Get him back in the kitchen; let him take the menu where he wanted it to go. I am not some bloody snob, but I donít want peanut butter and jelly leftovers from a forgotten doggie bag.

quote:
Originally posted by Erik Scott de Bie
Let me say this so it's clear: YOUR GAME IS NOT A CANON GAME. The second you create characters, your game isn't canon, because those characters don't exist in the actual canon sourcebooks. If they do someday get "canonized," and they're exactly the way you ran them, and/or the events of your game make it into a sourcebook, then and only then were you running (past-tense) a canon game.



Actually my game runs on top of a canon setting. They run on top of a consistent background. The background that is presented is built on hundreds of dollars of products. My expectation is that new product fits neatly onto the existing material. Like a map edge neatly lines up with another map edge. Itís bizarre that I have to point out that I mean this in a figurative and literal sense.
For my part if I decide to edit my map thatís on me, but as professionals who make money off selling these products, well - yes, I have an expectation that latest professional map lines up with the last professional map.
If the setting is not continuous what exactly is my incentive to continue with it? And if the stance taken is that these New Editions donít have to line up with previous versions, then why not just go all in and make it another setting entirely?
Ahhh, but WotC did that. They called it Eberron. I canít say definitively how thatís going, but I can tell you itís not on the bookshelves at my bookstore.
But letís say thatís unfair. Then why not put out yet another separate setting? A brand new map per se. One without those complicated topo lines, or even an arrow pointing north. A new map only with colors found in a Crayola box. Kidding aside. Give the new customers what they want, but donít make me subsidize it. It also strikes me as odd that newcomers complain about too much lore, when they canít buy the old lore. For example, you can only find the OGB used on Ebay.

I buy new product for the few bits of lore I might get out of it. Mere crumbs at this point made enjoyable by some very talented authors. But I believe Iíll have a use for it as a timeline to be prevented by heroes. So I am still buying, just not everything the way I had been, and now with an intention I really never expected.

quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

This thread is of no use to anyone who is forging their own path in the Realms, yes?



Itís useful to me in that Iíll pull a win out of this either way. Iíll wave these editions at my OGB players via future-seeing crystal ball, and say ďSee, go through the time gate, kill Cyric as a mortal, or this will happen.Ē
If the reboot happens thereís my new fixed timeline. If not, Iíll do it myself. Because I am looking at 64 pages of ďOne Canon, One Story, One Realms (5e)Ē, and the scientists answer to fixing this Frankenstein monster is to bring back the old iron neck bolts for the new brass ones, which causes consternation for another scientist who wants copper neck bolts. But no matter; letís move on to discuss replacing those hands with claws, which opens a new debate about how many digits on each claw and how long are the nails.
At 64 pages it seems clear to me thatÖ SURPRISEÖactually things can be made worse by trying to fix 4E. Once you mash a square-shaped setting a round hole, trying to mash it back into itís original square is pretty amazing but go ahead.
FWIW as much as I disagree with the "One Realms" solution, I appreciate Erik and James taking the time to discuss their Point of view.
But IMHO Wizards should go both routes.
Carry on 4th Edition into 5th
AND
Do a separate line with a reboot to OGB or thereabouts.


Former Forgotten Realms brand manager Jim Butler: "Everything that bears the Forgotten Realms logo is considered canon".
Go to Top of Page

snotereceorlas
Acolyte

United Kingdom
4 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  10:33:50  Show Profile Send snotereceorlas a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Publishing Realms-based novels


Sorry to take so long to reply. Wonít bore you with the details but I have a definitely-not-D&D-loving wife whose reactions need managing (ie: I canít play all the time or get on the forums as much as I would like. I know that sounds badÖ).

Furthermore... I hope people don't mind me just putting this post up almost out of nowhere (last mentioned on p18).

Thank you Matt James, Wooly Rupert and Lord Karsus for taking time to make helpful replies.

I might have been hurt by your reply Venger, if I wouldnít have been tempted to think like you did in your position. It would have been a shame if I had been offended since I've found myself in agreement with your posts. It did occur to me that the post might seem a bit whacky but I had hoped that the way I wrote it might give some indication that I was being serious.

Anyway thatís not important.

I should say straight out that I have a novel in another genre that so far has the green light but needs a lot of work to complete. A lot. My brother has six novels out already in the UK (one is available in German and Spanish) and we are going to the book launch of his seventh on Saturday (my wife is away so thatís two hours of gaming time down the pan). His position makes it easier for me to get stuff looked at. So I am serious. This makes the advice of Wooly Rupert and Matt James to the point Ė get established elsewhere first.

The fact is I really AM serious about the realms and writing a story set there. I think we are a bit out of the loop in the UK (well probably a lot actually) so it would be even harder to get noticed. Like I don't think i'll bump into Ed Greenwood at a conference over here and as far as I am aware RA Salvatore has no plans to come and visit. (And why should he? He doesnít need to.)

I had understood that unsolicited fiction set in already established worlds will be entertained. The information on writers guidelines is unchanged since 2007 http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/writersguidelines

I wrote the stuff in the very beginning for my two eldest sons, and as I wrote it up into an first draft that might be acceptable to a publisher I realised I wanted to be clear it was for the normal adult D&D audience. So the work so far, Lord Karsus, was done for pleasure and there is more to do (so your concern not to waste time was quite in place). In fact my eldest son urged me to make some attempt to get it into print since he has been following the ups and downs of the realms almost as keenly as I have.

At the uging of my eldest son I do game FoW (we have a very fine and extensive US 2nd Armored Division) and we are all looking forward to the new Bolt Action rules. For myself I have embarrassingly large Roman, medieval and AWI collections of figures and a growing ACW one.

So thanks for the answers. I really do appreciate it. Now Iíve found the forum and discussions like this some of my anxieties are gone. The Realms and D&D are, for me, almost inseparable. So letís raise a flagon and hope we get our Realms back!

Andrew
Go to Top of Page

AryalůmŽ
Senior Scribe

USA
666 Posts

Posted - 26 Jun 2012 :  15:12:01  Show Profile Send AryalůmŽ a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm all for a reboot back to 2e.
Go to Top of Page

LordXenophon
Learned Scribe

USA
110 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  00:45:49  Show Profile  Send LordXenophon an AOL message Send LordXenophon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Erendriel Durothil

I'm all for a reboot back to 2e.



Hear, hear!


There seems to be a bit of confusion about whether I would ever buy new Forgotten Realms materials. The answer is, it depends on what they publish.

I am simply NOT in the market for a new core book that contradicts what my campaign is based on. History is history. It's too late to change it.

I AM in the market for completely new material that fits in to what I already have. If they want my money, there are plenty of ways they can get it. There are still lots of blank spots on the map, monsters we don't know enough about, billions of player-created spells and items they could make official, and quite a few playable races that could use their own handbooks. The Arcane Age is full of locations which would make awesome dungeons in a Forgotten Realms campaign, if anyone ever finds the ruins. Elminster's Ecologies don't cover even 1% of what they could cover and neither do Volo's Guides. The various orders and minions of the other religions haven't been detailed any where near as well as those of Mystra and Iyachtu Xvim. There's more than enough opportunity to publish without a reset, right there.

And that doesn't even cover the one area where I think WotC is doing better than TSR did - adventure modules. WotC has always been good at cranking out the adventures and they can sell a good module to any of us. I don't mind having to convert it to 2e and match it to my established history, if it's good enough.

One other thing I have to say - accusing other people of trolling is in itself a form of trolling. Please don't do it.

Disintegration is in the eye of the Beholder.

Edited by - LordXenophon on 27 Jun 2012 01:33:44
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
30203 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  04:47:30  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Erendriel Durothil

I'm all for a reboot back to 2e.



My ideal Realms would be rebooted to the day after Cloak & Dagger.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Editor and scribe for The Candlekeep Compendium

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Seravin
Senior Scribe

Canada
792 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  04:56:26  Show Profile Send Seravin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Erendriel Durothil

I'm all for a reboot back to 2e.



Got my vote!
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
14020 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  05:22:31  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why wouldn't an earlier time-period work? Like the pre-1e (Edwardian) Realms? You know - the ones the knights of Myth Drannor adventured in, and Alusair was a little girl (and still very much alive, DAMMIT).

That doesn't have to invalidate any prior lore, and it also doesn't have to acknowledge it (its up to you to decide what you want to happen in your home game). However, as for the canon (novel) Realms, it would all be canon (until over-written by newer lore, which shouldn't ever happen... but does).

pre-1e (0e), or post-3e (NOT 4e) are my ideal choices (since I realize a complete reboot is never going to happen). Both eras have many interesting possibilities, and are close-enough to the 'known' era (1e/2e/3e) to still be relevant to most folks (in other words, 95% of your sourcebooks would still be valid, unlike in 4e). I'm hoping this "Elminster's Realms" will be a prequel product, and not some post-4e crap. The cover with the dark-elf Elminster is giving me a very bad feeling....

However - as I have said numerous times already - what I want, and what I think they should do aren't the same thing.

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone


Edited by - Markustay on 27 Jun 2012 05:24:51
Go to Top of Page

Old Man Harpell
Senior Scribe

USA
470 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  12:35:47  Show Profile  Visit Old Man Harpell's Homepage Send Old Man Harpell a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay
I'm hoping this "Elminster's Realms" will be a prequel product, and not some post-4e crap. The cover with the dark-elf Elminster is giving me a very bad feeling....

However - as I have said numerous times already - what I want, and what I think they should do aren't the same thing.


As I understand it (and I may not be totally accurate here), the 'Elminster's Realms' book is Ed's campaign before he sold it to TSR, plus the way that home campaign has evolved since, unaltered by anything TSR/WotC has done. So we may not see certain elements that were present even in the Old Grey Box. While the Moonshaes (for example) may be present geographically, it is possible they are a far cry from what we know in almost every other respect.

I for one am incredibly curious as to what Ed's original vision for the Realms is/was. I have been since the day I read that his home campaign is based on his original vision, not anything after the TSR sale. And by all appearances, we get to find out what it is. The fourth quarter of this year cannot come too soon for me.

- OMH
Go to Top of Page

Quale
Master of Realmslore

1755 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  12:43:21  Show Profile Send Quale a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Wotc are going to cover multiple eras, they said that a few months ago, why all this talk about a reboot?
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
30203 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  18:13:51  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Quale

Wotc are going to cover multiple eras, they said that a few months ago, why all this talk about a reboot?



Perhaps because we are fans of the setting and we have definite ideas for what we want? Perhaps because we don't know what WotC considers supporting multiple eras?

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Editor and scribe for The Candlekeep Compendium

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Venger
Learned Scribe

USA
266 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  18:17:27  Show Profile Send Venger a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Quale

Wotc are going to cover multiple eras, they said that a few months ago, why all this talk about a reboot?



Multiple eras doesn't change the fact that many don't like the Spellplague Realms, period. Nor does multiple era support solve the original problem, which is that many people wanted to see the 3E Realms evolve as it would have otherwise. You can't have that because eventually as you advance it you're going to run right into the Spellplague Realms. I'd prefer a Realms that can move past the date in which the Spellplague occured without the Spellplague existing.

"Beware what you say when you speak of magic, wizard, or you shall see who has the greater power."
Go to Top of Page

LordXenophon
Learned Scribe

USA
110 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  22:09:36  Show Profile  Send LordXenophon an AOL message Send LordXenophon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That is why, in my version of the Realms, Mystra is still Midnight. I just skipped that entirely.

And further change happened this weekend. One of my players is well enough versed in Realmslore to have realized that the gate to Avernus under Castle Dragonspear is a Holiest of Holies of the Church of Mystra. Once they deal with what destroyed the strine to Tempus, they want to replace it with a temple to Mystra. I just might allow it to happen, if they do a good enough job of greasing the wheels of bureaucracy.

Disintegration is in the eye of the Beholder.
Go to Top of Page

Matt James
Forgotten Realms Game Designer

USA
908 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  22:20:30  Show Profile Send Matt James a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I want a reboot to the Grey Box. That's my deep down desire and wish. I don't, however, know if this is even remotely feasible as a business plan. I often get into arguments here not because I'm a fanboi of the latest Realms, but because the Realms won't get supported at all if they only cater to fans like us. It's just not possible. They need to infuse new crazy ideas all the time in order to keep cash flowing. Continuity is a minimal benefit to them at all. This is why they got rid of continuity editors.
Go to Top of Page

Irennan
Great Reader

Italy
2693 Posts

Posted - 27 Jun 2012 :  22:27:44  Show Profile Send Irennan a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ew... The ''continuously introducing crazy ideas, no matter what'' part is not exactly encouraging for the One Realms goal...

That is if for ''crazy ideas'' you mean RSEs, godly dramas and continuity breaking retcons (etc...).

To all Facebook-using FR fans, you might be interested in checking out this page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/450517575051806/

Edited by - Irennan on 27 Jun 2012 22:30:01
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 23 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2017 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000