| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Entromancer |
Posted - 29 Dec 2015 : 00:39:36
Hey all, I was wondering - is the Companion's Codex a retread of ground covered in The Hunters Blades trilogy? I see there were some dragons involved this time...wanted to see if its worth reading or if I'd be better going straight to Archmage. |
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Entromancer |
Posted - 01 Jan 2016 : 07:23:14
You're right about RotK. Prince of Fools is smoother going. Maybe later. |
| Artemas Entreri |
Posted - 31 Dec 2015 : 03:18:42
I disliked the Companions Codex. Over-used Salvatore themes were used yet again. I don't know what was going on with Salvatore's editor during Rise of the King, but he/she really let the ball drop on that one. |
| Entromancer |
Posted - 31 Dec 2015 : 00:34:47
1/3 of the way into Night of the Hunter. Not a single horde of orcs in sight. Loving the drow politics and eager to see how they try to use the orcs to their advantage. If at all. Catti-brie's stance is interesting. Also like that Salvatore's going to tie Entreri's Companions of Neverwinter into the Companions of the Halls' quest. |
| Tanthalas |
Posted - 29 Dec 2015 : 12:55:53
*shrug*
Well, the Drizzt series is pretty long now so you're bound to see similar themes popping up from time to time.
The Companions Codex does introduce a lot of backstory that might be useful to know for Archmage, but you don't seem to particularly like the series so you can probably skip it. |
