Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Realmslore
 Chamber of Sages
 Questions for Brian R. James

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Alaundo Posted - 30 Sep 2007 : 17:00:01
Well met

This being a collective scroll of any questions the Scribes and visitors of Candlekeep wish to put to our newest Realms designer, Brian R. James. I'm sure Brian's work needs no introduction, his Grand History of the Realms once graced the halls of Candlekeep and is now a full product produced by WotC.

Brian is also a scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium.

Present your questions herein and check back to see what news may also come forth from the quill of this scribe.
25   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
BenN Posted - 15 Jan 2014 : 00:58:34
Hi Brian,

I originally wrote this in the Rose of Sarifal thread, but on reflection its probably best to post it here:

The Moonshaes are one of my favourite areas of the Realms, and Sarifal is intriguing; I really enjoyed your Realmslore: Sarifal article in Dragon. I'm developing a campaign storyline based on this area, including NPCs based there.

Some of the things I'm particularly interested in:

1) Relationship between LeShay & Llewyrr. According to realmslore, the latter have pledged allegiance to the former. Does this make Ate'Niah Lady Ordalf's vassal?

2) Relationship between humans (Ffolk, Northmen) and Llewyrr. What part did the Llewyrr play in defeating the Amnish settlers, and kicking the humans out of Gwynneth? Is this the reason for the 'strained relations'?

3) Relationship between Llewyrr and other elves (wood elves?) in Sarifal. If the wood elves are opposed to Fey expansionism, does this put them at odds with the Llewyrr, and might they be sympathetic to Ffolk designs to retake part of Gwynneth?


Any light you can shed on the above would be greatly appreciated!
Markustay Posted - 11 Nov 2012 : 18:59:44
I need info on the following, which appear on the 4e Cormyr map:

Valkur's Roar
Maloren's rest

Also, Mage Keep and Castle Aris both appear on the FRIA map as well, but I have no info on them.

EDIT:
New question: In your Chessenta article, which settlements can I assume aren't new as of the past (Wailing Years) century? Two I am suspect of, but the rest seem to have been there awhile.




Dalor Darden Posted - 31 Oct 2012 : 01:25:01
I had a quick one for Brian from a previous conversation in another thread:

quote:

Originally posted by Brian R. James


quote:

Originally posted by Dalor Darden

I'm still trying to dig up some information on "The Lone Tower" and the Giant's Cairn as well.

In earlier maps the two are listed as being separate from each other; but in the new map from the "Monument of the Ancients" adventure they are placed together, with the tower in the middle of the cairn area.



I designed the map for Monument of the Ancients and I'd be happy to address any inconsistencies found within. Yet, this isn't one of them.

Examine the following quote from TSR9474 "The Moonsea" p.31

The Lone Tower
This tall granite tower was built to protect the Moonsea
against Thar. Years ago it was a scene of a great
slaughter between the humans of Thar and beings
from the north.

There is a round field, called the Giant's Cairn, surrounding
the Tower. The barren stretch is dotted with
great burial mounds capped with stones. I have been
told that some inscriptions on the stones are curses
that summon giants, but that sounds too far-fetched
to be true. Many of Thar#146;s humanoids who died at the
Lone Tower are said to be buried at the Giants#146; Cairn.
I tend to favor lore descriptions found in text, so I used this as an opportunity to correct a mistake repeated on earlier maps. I hope Markus finds this change less "repugnant" now that he knows the facts behind the decision.

BTW, I *am* working on a new map of the area so if there is anything to correct, now would be the time to bring it to my attention!





Thanks Brian!

I appreciate that...I totally overlooked that bit of writing.

What is your map for?
Quale Posted - 28 Oct 2012 : 08:57:52
Thanks for the reply, I've found out later that they're from 4e DMG 2. It would be great to have more such connections between two settings. I asked because I remember reading somewhere that the Hosttower had branches to other planes.
Shemmy Posted - 27 Oct 2012 : 11:08:30
quote:
Originally posted by Quale


Also the Shemeshka article mentions the Arcane Brotherhood among other old organizations from Sigil, are they from Luskan?



I hate to intrude into Brian's thread here, but I think I can field an answer here since I'm pretty sure I wrote the relevant section.

Same name, different organization. It's plucked from previous material on Sigil (Society of the Luminiferous Aether could fit on the list there as well as a mage's collective, but it's more obscure), however there's nothing preventing there being members of the Luskan organization having made their way to Sigil and joining it.
Sightless Posted - 14 Oct 2012 : 14:02:16
I'm not sure who is the best person to be asking this question to, if you aren't the best person to ask, or if you feel you can direct me to another source, I would be most appreciative. I am attempting to deal with Lady Hope’s sons, birthdays, who is alive, and what positions they might have as of 1479. From what I can get of the source material I have, and what Dragon-magazines I can listen to, has lead to the following: Tarthilmor Aerasume (CG hem F11/W12) is set as one of the two Captains of
the Spellguard under Jorus Azuremantle. DRAGON ANNUAL #1, p60

Methrammar Aerasume, the Shining Guard (LG hem F14/W12) and commander of
Luruar's armies. THE NORTH, Cities p55

Dalbrant Tanagathor (1240 - 1313?) Disappeared while on quest given him by
Taerntym

Hardorbryn Tanagathor (1242 - 1343) Twin of Alondel; died in battle with
the Moonlight Men

Alondel Tanagathor (1242 - 1343) Twin of Hardorbryn; died in battle with
the Moonlight Men

Boesild Aerasume (1244 - ?) Oldest known/acknowledged surviving son of
Alustriel; former apprentice of Khelben the Elder just after he left
Waterdeep in 1256; now part of the Teukiira/Moonstars.

Elnriyr Moonweather (1250 - 1347) Priest of Sehanine; died in the fire that destroys Everdusk Hall

Baerndar Tanagathor (1266 - ?)

Uoundeld of Silverymoon (1269 - ?) Teacher at the Lady's College (Tactical
&
Strategic Spellcasting)

Dolthauvin Aerasume (1295 - ?) Wanderer in the Moonwood & Coldwood

Elinthalar Tanagathor (1299 - ?) Twin of Andelver; wanderer of Lurkwood

Andelver Tressymfriend (1299 - ?) Twin of Elinthalar; wanderer of Lurkwood

Methrammar Aerasume (1304 - ?) The Shining Guard & most recognized son of
Alustriel

Inthylyn of Silverymoon (1314 - ?) ?????????????????

Lilinthar Moonweather (1337 - ?) Triplet brother of Naerond & Tarthilmor;
huntmaster of Moonweather clan in Moonwood?

Naerond Aerasume (1337 - ?) Triplet brother of Lilinthar & Tarthilmor;
crusader/mage for Mystra?

Tarthilmor Aerasume (1337 - ?) Triplet brother of Naerond & Lilinthar;
Spell
Captain of the Spellguard in Silverymoon

Raerilarr Aerasume (1340 - ?) Smallest of Tall Ones at 6'7" and nicknamed
"Tiny" by brothers; most hot-tempered of brothers, rabid drow hunter.
Ghaelryss the Bold (1345 - ?) Uses no surname, raised in Silverymoon,
living in Everlund?

I am assuming that Methrammar is king with his mother’s passing, as he is the most recognized, if not necessarily the oldest. As I have said I shall be grateful for any help on the matter.
Brian R. James Posted - 09 Sep 2012 : 18:33:36
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

Greetings Brian, I've a query about shardsouls, as referenced in your 'Realmslore: Vaasa' article from DUNGEON #177, pg. 5. Specifically, this portion of text:-
quote:
Luminaries are also responsible for the crafting of shardsouls, monstrous automatons formed from Telos’s body and set to serve in Vaasa’s armies.
What more can you share about these shardsouls? Particularly, the methods/techniques the Luminaries utilise in their creation of these automatons?

Greetings Sage. I believe soulshards are Rich Baker's original creation, but I've included some of my notes below from when I was working on the Vaasa article:

Shardsouls are living constructs, forged by the Warlock Knights of Vaasa from the iron like flesh of the slumbering primordial Telos. The body of the Master of the Iron Sky is ever-regenerating, resulting in a nigh-inexhaustible supply of ironfell for the Warlock Knights. Durable as steel and imbued with exotic extraplanar properties, ironfell is used predominantly in the crafting of arms and armor, as well as the Knight’s signature “iron rings”.

Only the enigmatic order of Luminaries—an elite sect of the Telosian Templars within the knighthood—are permitted to craft shardsouls. Unlike common ironfell, which is simply mined by conventional means, Luminaries employ complex rituals to ensure Telos’ potent lifeforce is preserved during the extraction. The exact process for forging a shardsoul is known only to the Luminaries, but the result is a living, self-aware automaton far superior to the simple-minded constructs crafted by wizards of other lands.

Shardsouls are fearless, perhaps overly so. Though they will not sacrifice their lives arbitrarily, shardsouls are often reckless in combat. From the day they are forged, each shardsoul endeavors to be reunited with Telos. Each knows instinctively that its animating spirit will join with the Master of the Iron Sky upon death, a fate that is looked upon with anticipation not apprehension.
Quale Posted - 09 Sep 2012 : 12:58:19
well met, two questions about the recent Dungeon articles. In Ecology of the Modron it says that Mechanus is just one realm in the Accordant Expanse, what other realms could exist there? Is the Accordant Expanse a part of the new 5e cosmology?

Also the Shemeshka article mentions the Arcane Brotherhood among other old organizations from Sigil, are they from Luskan?
Matt James Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 21:44:01
I'm sorry you're getting offended. I never meant to insult you, especially not personally. CK has been more resistant to the idea of a Compendium than it ever has in the past. The sites that received CnD letters were violating WotC's IP in ways that were inappropriate. If it were a matter of a fanfic/non-profit site getting hammered, I might be more willing to accept CKs response.
Wooly Rupert Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 18:21:06
quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

Right. That's been the excuse, but WotC could have shut you down at any point leading up to this. If CK doesn't want to take that risk, I fully understand.



They could have, yes. But it's theoretically possible that they were just waiting for that final offense -- the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.

I'm getting rather offended at your insinuations that this has had anything to do with anything other wanting to make sure this site remained online.

In an era where sites have been shut down (admittedly, for different circumstances, but still shut down) and where WotC has gone out of its way to say "Here's the rules you're going to play by, if you want to avoid our lawyers," why is it so bad to want them to okay this?
Matt James Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 15:20:38
Right. That's been the excuse, but WotC could have shut you down at any point leading up to this. If CK doesn't want to take that risk, I fully understand.
Wooly Rupert Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 15:14:12
quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

I agree. The Compendium is very much a big piece of Candlekeep. I don't want to see it elsewhere, but CK hasn't been willing to do one for awhile.



Incorrect. We've been quite willing to do one. We've been unwilling to risk getting shut down by WotC for it.
Matt James Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 11:47:23
I agree. The Compendium is very much a big piece of Candlekeep. I don't want to see it elsewhere, but CK hasn't been willing to do one for awhile.
The Red Walker Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 03:43:02
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

Sage, it looks like there is difference in opinion by CK. If you guys don't want to do it, I understand. I'll head it up on my own.

Well, we haven't made a final decision yet, so I don't want you to assume that we're against it. That's certainly not the case. And, to be honest, I would love Candlekeep to continue it's tradition of providing fine fan-based Realmslore via the Compendium.

I've nothing against you or loremaster.org heading up your own initiative, but for the time being, I would prefer that the Compendium format remain our baby... at least until we have Alaundo's final word on the matter. [Which I'm presently asking for now.]



If the compendium were moved to another site, howerver worthy(I can think of no better place than with a James brother).....this place would loose a huge piece of its identity.....I' m sure Alaundo realizes,this, but hope he tells you full speed ahead. sooner rather than later.
The Sage Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 03:12:37
quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

Sage, it looks like there is difference in opinion by CK. If you guys don't want to do it, I understand. I'll head it up on my own.

Well, we haven't made a final decision yet, so I don't want you to assume that we're against it. That's certainly not the case. And, to be honest, I would love Candlekeep to continue it's tradition of providing fine fan-based Realmslore via the Compendium.

I've nothing against you or loremaster.org heading up your own initiative, but for the time being, I would prefer that the Compendium format remain our baby... at least until we have Alaundo's final word on the matter. [Which I'm presently asking for now.]
Matt James Posted - 06 Sep 2012 : 03:03:32
Sage, it looks like there is difference in opinion by CK. If you guys don't want to do it, I understand. I'll head it up on my own.
The Sage Posted - 05 Sep 2012 : 04:03:07
quote:
Originally posted by Matt James

I would be happy to head it up, Markustay.

Just following this up, and directing interested folk to the new scroll I've crafted for discussing the future of the Compendium here at Candlekeep:- http://forum.candlekeep.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=16924
The Sage Posted - 05 Sep 2012 : 03:58:34
Greetings Brian, I've a query about shardsouls, as referenced in your 'Realmslore: Vaasa' article from DUNGEON #177, pg. 5. Specifically, this portion of text:-
quote:
Luminaries are also responsible for the crafting of shardsouls, monstrous automatons formed from Telos’s body and set to serve in Vaasa’s armies.
What more can you share about these shardsouls? Particularly, the methods/techniques the Luminaries utilise in their creation of these automatons?
Matt James Posted - 05 Sep 2012 : 03:43:51
I would be happy to head it up, Markustay.
Markustay Posted - 05 Sep 2012 : 00:49:37
Because I am suggesting that WotC be given final say, and ownership.

I proposed just such a paradigm a long time ago, when we first ran into this problem, and several people here (including wooly, IIRC) were vehemently against it. Of course, this was at the height of the anti-WotC backlash.

So what I am suggesting is continue with the CKC, but detach it from Candlekeep proper (for legal reasons), and give them the sort of 'creative control' they had over the LFR in 4e.

Or it could just continue as-is, here, which I'd prefer, but then I think some sort of accord with WotC needs to be reached. Personally, I just don't see the need for it, but obviously others here do. We either need to move forward, or find some other way. The clock is ticking, and if we don't make the first move, someone will beat us to it.

Or worse, no-one will... and FR won't get the love it deserves when 5e is released.
The Sage Posted - 04 Sep 2012 : 02:15:34
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay

Create a separate site that would have both official approval (and final say) that is just dedicated to creating realmslore.
I don't really see how this differs from the position Candlekeep currently finds itself in. We're essentially a separate site, and we're awaiting official approval.

How does your proposal suggest anything different when you'd still have to be granted that approval by Wizards... just as this Candlekeep is waiting for?
Markustay Posted - 03 Sep 2012 : 20:55:27
This is my thinking as well.

Create a separate site that would have both official approval (and final say) that is just dedicated to creating realmslore. Nothing would be canon unless the material was reproduced - in whole or in part - on the WotC site, or in book.

In other words, breaking the CKC off from Candlekeep proper. It would work pretty much the way it always has, but give WotC ownership of the material to avoid any legal hassles. It would be a buffer between CK and them. That way, anyone who is unhappy about WotC gaining control of their creations can just continue to wait around for WotC to give some sort of permission to the CKC to continue (which, I fear, will be never).

Of course, as part of that agreement, some sort of compensation should be in order for material that gets used elsewhere. That should be incentive for WotC to back such a project - they can pick and choose from already written articles as to whether they want to make that lore official or not. Its almost like having a 'fluff buffet'. The articles can also be tweaked before they become official (which provides yet another layer of continuity).

Its almost like combining the 4e LFR with the CKC (and even the 'CORE' concept).
Hawkins Posted - 03 Sep 2012 : 18:09:43
It would be cool if WotC would support something like pathfinderchronicler.net where while none of the writing is considered canon, the writers are encouraged by Paizo to write their fan fiction and become better writers. I got the first volume of their works at PaizoCon.
Markustay Posted - 03 Sep 2012 : 00:29:26
Sounds like a plan.

I can scrap my idea for a 'Library of Perpustakaan' now.

(thats the Candelkeep-like place in the southern part of K-T, which I have always imagined to be 'Candlekeep East', not just in theme, but an actual connection between the two).

EDIT: The 'Perpustakaan Compendium' just didn't have the right ring to it.
Brian R. James Posted - 02 Sep 2012 : 16:35:36
My formost desire would be to nudge the powers-that-be to get a new Candlekeep Compendium going again. But if that is just not possible, then I am very much in favor of seeing a new Realms fanzine arise. My brother does have RPG forums at loremaster.org. Perhaps we might initiate something there.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2014 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000